Panchakarma

Ayurveda is an Indian traditional medicine that is unknown in the West. That's what this study looked at. Thirty women took surveys on their quality of life, mental health, and behavior change. Measurements are required before, during, and three months after the program. However, good health habits and self-efficacy in adopting Ayurveda to improve health increased. Three months after returning home, patients' social support and depression levels fell significantly. Behavioral change complicated Panchakarma may help people remain on track with new and better habits.

This is the first western investigation of Ayurveda's Panchakarma treatment. Many studies indicate that Ayurveda can treat specific ailments. Panchakarma helps the body get rid of harmful toxins. Detailed research on complex, multifaceted, or traditional medical practices requires initial descriptive or observational investigations.

We chose to study social change because it is theoretically important. The Panchakarma holistic health program is checked for its beneficial effects on the body. Changes in social support, quality of life, and lifestyle are included. Social assistance has offered several benefits for the sick in Western scientific literature. Both humans and animals who receive or report high levels of social support to have superior health outcomes. According to animal and human studies, people who lack social support may have distinct immune functions. Social support can help people manage stress and maintain good health. Numerous studies have validated this idea. Chronic stress impairs immunological function, cytokine production, and the immune system's ability to respond to anti-inflammatory signals. Chronic stress links impaired immune function and low socioeconomic level in children with low socioeconomic status. Meaningful interactions improve self-esteem and health.

Because social characteristics influence health, it is critical to study how to improve social support, especially for those at high risk of disease. Even though it is challenging, this type of research is necessary. For example, spontaneous emotional support enhances cognitive resilience [18] but does not further help [19]. So social support evolves with time. If there are social change mechanisms, people may need to adjust their self-perception in partnerships. A few health and behavior modification initiatives address environmental issues. Like other holistic medicine systems, Ayurveda attempts to improve the world by changing the person. These programs may help you enhance your health behavior programs by offering you ideas to improve them.

This is a new area of research. In one case, a Tai Chi exercise program improved people's feelings about their psychosocial quality, including social support. Also, participants in an educational and experiential cardiac rehabilitation retreat program were happier and more connected to others. This program involved group discussions, nutrition and stress management lectures, yoga and meditation activities, and hands-on communication skills training; participants felt more connected to others after the retreat. These positive results may lead to more complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies using psychological elements.

The five components of Ayurveda are air, fire, water, and earth. Ayurveda's therapeutic and preventative strategy is unique. It's about promoting health rather than curing diseases, as Western medicine focuses on. According to Ayurvedic belief, toxins, or "ama," pile up and flood the tissues when the body's equilibrium is off. This could make you sick. Like other holistic systems, Ayurveda users can get medical care suited to their needs. Like other holistic therapies, the patient's social environment influences their health and well-being. Indeed, considering the social context can help us understand holism. Social ties and support are vital in Ayurvedic diagnosis. To examine the patient's social situation, therapy strategies are modified. Ayurvedic therapy may therefore help patients see more incredible social support and better grasp the social world.

At Kripalu, the author modified the Panchakarma technique with the help of an Ayurvedic practitioner. These adjustments will make Panchakarma more accessible to Americans. The program was trimmed in length, and various techniques skipped the program. It usually lasts two weeks in India and four weeks in a hospital. Depending on the issue, vomiting (or "vamana") and bloodletting may be used (or "rakta moksha"). Americans dislike vomiting, don't understand its benefits, and rarely do it. In Rakta moksha, a treatment not permitted in the US, live leeches are in use. We kept massage, enemas, and a new diet. This is the Kripalu Panchakarma schedule.

The procedure was authorized by the author's initial institutional review board. Then everyone signed a document agreeing to the terms. Thus, even if naturalistic data exist, patients' healing interests matter.

Initially, the Panchakarma program's director told those interested in participating: (HG). If a potential subject wants to participate, the director transmits their contact information to the study director (LC). All interested and capable participants were included in the study. No omissions.

When LC came on site, she visited with the subject to learn more about the study and the informed consent process. The baseline measurement pack is now available. When I first arrived at Kripalu three months later, on the last day of the five-day program. So I did it three times. That's what this paper is about.

The Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II measures people's behavior. The frequency of excellent health behaviors results from using a four-point scale. Patients at the Kripalu Center receive Ayurvedic massages, cleansing diets, herbal enemas, group stress-relief talks, tailored yoga sessions, and cookery classes. This retreat lasts five days. Stress management and personal responsibility for your health are also covered. The question is how often the activity occurs (never, Occasionally, Frequently, Routinely). It has been validated in various investigations.

The SF-12 is a great way to express how you feel and how well you can perform things. Self-efficacy is a single measure of how the person believes she can handle difficulties using Ayurvedic methods. The Beck Anxiety Inventory has 21 questions. There are 21 questions in total, each relating to an anxiety symptom. It is widely utilized and has good psychometric qualities.

The Interpersonal Support Evaluation List is a 14-item questionnaire that assesses social support confidence in various settings. A modified version of the Sarason Social Support Questionnaire was also used to determine social support received and satisfaction. This six-item measure asks about favorable emotional, informational, and instrumental connections. We chose two social support metrics that looked at social support slightly differently. Example 1 provides specifics, whereas Example 2 addresses more general topics. To measure changes in social support, one of our core constructs, we needed long research. That's why the perceived stress scale is created. The test is widely in use and psychometrically sound.

All data were collected and analyzed using SPSS. The conclusions are based on paired data. The hypothesis that means did not change significantly over time for any metric is tested using student t-tests. The baseline study outcomes were also compared to a 5-day retreat. To determine the magnitude of the change over time, compare the mean values at the start and three months afterward.

From February to November 2006, there were four Panchakarma sessions. A typical session contains four to eight participants from the study's first cohort of 20 women aged 27 to 54. Two were Asian, and the others were American. Most respondents have a bachelor's degree and make at least $50,000 annually. Twelve women were followed for three months after therapy.

Also, the way people view social assistance may alter. We could model social support as a behavior change mediator if we had enough people and the proper controls. It's acceptable to think about digital as part of a more comprehensive strategy. While external influences may impact an individual's ability to attain a goal, it is difficult to observe how they interact. This is how things look at the start of the research. According to the study, social support may not be handy even if part of more significant intervention. The comprehensive picture of the patient is a crucial component of a complicated CAM system—social support wires into the system, not an add-on.

It is more effective when a behavior change program is specific to the individual's lifestyle. A behavior modification program is the same as the user's needs and is more effective. Relevance can be improved by increasing perceived social support and using holistic systems.

If so, the results may raise new questions concerning health behavior. People can't modify how they spend time with others, which frustrates health behavior researchers. For example, our ethnicity, gender, and education contribute to health risks. Complex CAM medical interventions may help people with anxiety or low self-efficacy. Some CAM therapies interact with the subject on an interpersonal level.

But can we be sure we didn't just modify attitudes around social support? Even though it wasn't the study's primary purpose, we were curious. We looked at the individuals' stated social network index when collecting data. That displays how many friends and how often they use them. Panchakarma patients haven't made much of an impact in this structural metric. This is intriguing because it supports the idea that social support can be increased without affecting social network structure. Even if the subject's social surroundings do not change, their impression of it does. This is a phenomenological alteration, not a structural one. This study shows that adjusting your perceptions can be as beneficial as having someone help you.